The United States of America is known for allowing many different ideas to be shared. Since its early years, America believed that if you do not allow someone to question the things around him, then free speech is not free. Allowing others to state their views, no matter what they are or who is speaking, led to the creation of the First Amendment.
Read more At the intersection of climate and diversity
But what if people stop speaking their minds because they are afraid of what may happen to them? In other words, what happens when people remain silent — not because the government is censoring them, but because the personal cost of speaking has become too great?
The First Amendment was never intended to protect only speech that everyone agrees with. Popular opinions require little protection. If you think differently from most or are going against the popular opinion or someone in power, the First Amendment is what keeps you safe. Constitutional safeguards matter most in times of disagreement. The Founders understood that disagreement can expose error, inspire reform, and preserve liberty.
We have learned throughout history that some ideas are now considered normal but were once condemned as offensive. Many times, it took one person to stand for their idea and face backlash from others. The freedom to express an unpopular opinion is what makes this country great.
But what if someone doesn’t speak out because he is afraid of losing his job? The threat to free expression does not always come in the form of government censorship. It can emerge through fear of social and professional consequences. A single online comment can travel nationwide within minutes. Careers can be damaged and reputations permanently altered over words that once might have been part of an ordinary disagreement. Whether the pressure comes from employers, universities, corporations, political organizations, social media, or public opinion, the result may be the same. When someone stops asking if it is right to say something and starts asking if that thing is worth saying, that is when we have lost free speech.
The chilling effect extends beyond political opinions. People who believe in a religion may start asking if it is right to speak about their religion. The First Amendment protects freedom of speech and the free exercise of religion because the Founders wanted to keep us free from the government controlling what we say and what we can believe. Once people stop feeling comfortable speaking about what they believe in, free speech is no longer free. Moreover, religious liberty becomes fragile when people remain legally free to worship but feel culturally forbidden to speak about what they believe.
A government may silence its citizens through law, and a culture may silence them through fear. To those who no longer feel able to speak, the outcome can look remarkably similar. This should concern every American, regardless of political affiliation. Both the political left and the political right have attempted to suppress ideas they considered dangerous. The temptation to silence opposing viewpoints belongs to no single ideology or generation.
Read more The Republic of Ireland’s antisemitism
The answer to disagreeable speech has never been less speech. Instead, it is better speech. Open debate allows truth to be tested. It exposes weak arguments, corrects misinformation, and invites thoughtful discussion. Suppression, by contrast, may grant forbidden ideas an undeserved mystique while denying society the opportunity to confront and refute them openly.
There will always be those whom we disagree with, and that is okay, as long as we have the freedom to speak out about what we believe and not to fear what will happen to us. Free speech depends upon a willingness to participate without fear of personal destruction. Free societies are strengthened by debate, not weakened by it.
The First Amendment cannot guarantee courage or ensure that every opinion will be welcomed. It guarantees protection from government interference. Preserving the spirit of that freedom requires more from us: a willingness to defend the rights of people whose ideas we may strongly oppose.
And when free speech exists only for those willing to pay an ever-increasing personal price, we must ask whether it remains as free as our Constitution intended — or whether free speech is truly free at all.
Deborah A. Wilson is a Georgetown University Law graduate. Attorney, author, and published writer. She resides in Northern Virginia and is the author of the speculative fiction book The Seam: Secrets Beneath the North Pole.
Read more America has the soccer talent and two teenagers just proved it: Now fix the pipeline
Image: Pezibear via Pixabay, Pixabay License.