On Oct. 10, 2026, at a midterm rally in Clarksville, Tennessee, President Donald Trump did two things no campaign consultant would have scripted.
Read more A Deplorable debunks the ‘blue wave’
When a woman in the crowd called out that she loved him, he stopped to say she was beautiful, then complained that calling a woman beautiful means “the end of your political career.”
Later he told the audience he could say “the stupidest things” and they would still clap. They laughed, and then they clapped.
Critics heard a man reducing a woman to her looks and mocking his own supporters. Admirers heard a man being himself. Both camps learned something real about him, and that is my point. I would rather hear a politician’s imperfect honesty than watch his perfect pretending. Voters can judge what a candidate actually thinks. They cannot judge a script.
Modern campaigns are engineered to remove information. Every sentence is polled and every answer funneled back to approved talking points. At a Republican debate on Feb. 6, 2016, Sen. Marco Rubio, an intelligent man, repeated the same rehearsed line about President Obama four times. Gov. Chris Christie pounced: “There it is. The memorized 25-second speech.” Rubio was not dishonest. He was over-programmed, and voters suddenly wondered who had written the program.
Democrats have their robots too. In 2000, Vice President Al Gore was, as a New York Review of Books essay observed, notorious for a wooden face and robotic movements, though people who knew him described a playful man the public rarely met.
Americans have rewarded plain speech in both parties.
In 1948, when a supporter shouted “Give ’em hell, Harry!”, Harry Truman later explained that he never gave anyone hell; he told the truth and they thought it was hell. The polls predicted his defeat. He won.
Exactly 18 years before Clarksville, on Oct. 10, 2008, Sen. John McCain took the microphone back from a supporter in Lakeville, Minnesota, who called Barack Obama “an Arab.” No, ma’am, McCain said; Obama was a decent family man with whom he simply disagreed. It was not the convenient answer for a candidate trailing in the polls. It was what he believed.
On Oct. 13, 2015, Sen. Bernie Sanders warned a debate audience that his next remark “may not be great politics,” then said Americans were sick of hearing about Hillary Clinton’s “damn emails.” His campaign manager said the line was entirely off the cuff. It drew the loudest applause of the night.
Read more La surprise d’octobre
Polished politicians do not lose their real views. They hide them until a hidden microphone finds them.
On April 6, 2008, at a closed-door San Francisco fundraiser, Obama described frustrated voters who “cling to guns or religion.” On May 17, 2012, in Boca Raton, Mitt Romney told donors that his job was “not to worry about” the 47 percent who would back Obama. Those private sentences told voters more than months of rallies did. Michael Kinsley put it best: a gaffe is when a politician tells the truth. Punish every gaffe, and you train politicians to hide.
Many will say a president should not comment on a woman’s looks from a stage, and voters may hold it against him. But a politician who privately respects women far less, yet never lets it show, is not more respectful. He is only better hidden. I would rather know. The candid politician hands me the evidence; the polished one makes me hunt for it.
One caution. A found that voters who distrust the establishment can see a candidate who tells obvious falsehoods as authentic. Unfiltered style is not truthful substance.
I want politicians to reveal their real feelings and beliefs, not to invent facts and call it candor.
In a democracy, citizens hire a human being, not a press release. Trump is one example of the unfiltered style; Truman, McCain and Sanders are others, from both parties. I do not ask politicians to be perfect. I ask them to be real, so I can decide whether I like what I see. Imperfect honesty serves voters better than perfect pretending.
Meda Parameswara Reddy, Ph.D., is the Director of the Reddy Center for Critical and Integrated Thinking. A former R&D executive holding 30 U.S. patents, he specializes in interdisciplinary research and public policy analysis. His writing has appeared in Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. (PNAS), RealClear Markets, Science and Defense platforms; Washington Examiner, SpaceNews, The Fulcrum, The Humanist, American Thinker, AFRO American, and South Asia Monitor (on the editorial board, and also hosts the show “SAM Dialogues with Dr. M. P. Reddy.”) Website: mpreddyinsights.com | Contact: [email protected], https://lnkd.in/gn2zQJbs
Read more Facilitating deportations of illegal aliens
Image: Screenshot from LiveNOW from FOX video, via YouTube