Three of the jurors in the now-mistrialed Lindsay Clancy trial over killing her three children have spoken out … and revealed themselves to be utter clueless fools!
Read more The second killing of Charlie Kirk
One has to wonder how did these three women who agreed to be interviewed get on that jury at all?
They were, as the fourth anonymous juror said, “biased from day one.”
Fox News host Jesse Watters had it right when he said that he, if he were a jury consultant, would have eliminated those three based on their hair.”
Very funny and probably a wise observation. They are each attractive in their own way, each the epitome of leftist women, like those one might meet at any academic convention of American Marxist professors of history, literature or politics.
For women like these, artifacts of the 1960s, they are likely second generation feminists who have seemingly doubled down on their anti-American, anti-male, professed hatred of America and men. They appeared to be the precursors of the “toxic masculinity” crowd, labeled so by angry women who were carefully taught to hate men and the nuclear family that for millennia has propelled, propagated and preserved humanity.
How on earth did the prosecution in this case end up with a jury so compromised by their own arrogance and lack of ethics, guaranteed to defend the indefensible?
The three of them who have agreed to speak publicly are each of a piece – they look and speak like typical leftists, they appear to be anti-men, they are likely pro-all-manner-of-medications-until-they-are-not.
In other words, they seem entirely predictable as in cliché. Attend any academic conference and you will find yourself surrounded by women who look, act and speak exactly like these three jurors who are so proud of themselves for ignoring/forgetting the grisly murder of three innocent children by the person they most loved and trusted in their short lives. Their murder is, in every sense, unforgiveable.
Obviously, the prosecution did not employ a jury consultant or they would have known that a bevy of aged sixty-plus nurses and teachers would have sympathized with a mother who “viciously killed her three children.”
For most of us out here in the real world, where the murder of another human being is anathema, verboten, let alone the most horrific kind of murder, the killing of one’s own children, these three women are clearly proud of their “not guilty” verdict, which according to a fourth juror who agreed to be interviewed anonymously, was set in stone before any deliberations took place. These women’s defense of Lindsey Clancy, despite her admission that she strangled her three beautiful children, the murders were apparently not an issue. They expressed no concern for those murdered kids. Their mission was to see her acquitted due to her alleged post-partum psychosis.
Read more A Kenyan tragically loses his job to AI
In the words of Tom Selleck in the wonderful film, Three Men and a Little Lady, “What a crock.”
Nothing, no claim of insanity, of “not responsible due to mental. Illness,” is a legal excuse for the cold-blooded murder of one’s own children. There never is and can never be, an excuse for such a horrific crime.
Watching the videos of the three jurors express their anger at the lone juror who refused to vote not guilty is stupefying!
They express, without a shred of self-awareness, their affection for Lindsay Clancy, as if she is some sort of celebrity, a film or TV star they have long admired.
They express their actual affection for Clancy’s attorney, Kevin Reddington, as if he is the actual star of the show. “He is so entertaining, so compassionate.”
But Clancy herself is a pathetic person, privileged but mentally ill, who calculated the manner by which she would kill her three young children, asking for a lawyer the minute she became conscious after her failed suicide attempt.
This is the woman they have offered up their own code of ethics to defend, all of which proves their wholesale lack of character.
If these three women cannot see pure evil when, where and in whom it exists, they are absolutely not qualified to decide the culpability of a woman who murders her own children.
indsey Clancy deserves death or at the very least she belongs in prison for the rest of her life.
Read more My Body/My Choice on trial
Image: Screenshot from The Megyn Kelly Show, via YouTube