The dreadful word “misogyny” is often misapplied. In fact, it is those who claim misogynistic victimhood who are often the worst perpetrators — lefty feminists.
Read more Data centers: Not that scary
One treads on eggshells when daring to legitimately criticize leftist women for anything. Rather than confront their inadequacies, they’ll turn the tables by hurling misandrist labels that threaten the reputations and livelihoods of men. It’s said that if everything is racist, then nothing is racist. Misogynistic behavior is also rarer than it is evoked by the liberation feminists.
Some of the defining attributes of so-called misogyny are hostility towards women who seek power, independence, or equality. There are problems here:
First: with rare exceptions, leftist women and power don’t mix well. Beyond indoctrinated Gen Zs and a smattering of geriatric socialists, who the heck really wants a powerful leftist woman, anyway? I bring you Seattle Mayor Katie Wilson:
Missy Wilson is really screwing things up in the once-Emerald City. Never, so early in a Seattle mayor’s term, have ratings been so low as they are for Wilson. Deliberations about a recall petition are already underway.
Is describing leftist women as “hysterical” really misogynistic if it is often true? As exemplified by Wilson, their physical presence is not particularly commanding, their raised voices become screechy, and their mental presence is often vapid. Nature has configured them to be feeble.
Read more Freedom removed from WNBA game, America
Second: in a modern society that necessitates specialization, achieving “independence” is a fool’s errand. Even if leftist women are able to band together in some dysfunctional sisterhood commune, eventually they will require some toxic masculinity to invent, fix, and build things. After all, when was the last time you saw a woman in your neighborhood up on the roof, under the car in the driveway, or maneuvering an excavator? It’s very rare.
Third: there is no such thing as “equality” other than in their peculiar contrivances. Frankly, many leftist women are adrift from reality. They want “liberation” but are actually mentally imprisoned. Lacking a spiritual compass, they are much more prone to physical, mental, and emotional breakdowns. They have a hard time keeping it together, let alone being a positive influence on others outside their echo chamber. So, the sooner they dispel the myth of equality, the sooner they can overcome their mental disorders. Then, they can attend to the needs and desires of the patriarchy more assiduously.
That’s all compelling, but there’s an even more fundamental reason why the feminists have gone mental. If a leftist “person with a uterus” can’t define what a woman is, then how can one be misogynistic? As with many of their gender-studies concoctions, it doesn’t make sense.
To deflect from their flaws, lefty feminists engage in psychological projection. To wit: the real misogyny originates from the ugly and disgruntled leftists toward the lovely, smart, considerate, compassionate, conservative ladies like Natalie Harp and Karoline Leavitt. While abiding by nature’s imperatives, they can still earn respect by virtue of their “Fascinating Womanhood,” as expounded by Helen B. Andelin.
As opposed to fake feminism, that’s true femininity. No gold star for guessing who is happier.
Read more How dare billionaires make money off their money
