I see from this article that Oregon has reached the top of the idiocy pyramid with Initiative Petition 28, an all-inclusive initiative “animal cruelty” measure, written by people who have no idea the consequences of initiative.IP 28.
Read more Cleaning the stables: How Trump gets rid of RINOs
Petition to Ban Hunting and Fishing in Oregon Reaches Threshold to be on the Ballot This Fall
Back in February, we told you about a petition that was being circulated by progressives in Oregon, to essentially ban hunting and fishing in the state. It’s actually worse than that. They are trying to ban the killing of animals in the state, so this would not only affect hunting, but also the raising of animals for food.
As you can surmise, Oregon wants all of its citizens to be vegan, miserable, and meatless 100% of the time. It isn’t enough that these urban cretins don’t eat meat; now they want to force all of us to bow to their infinite wisdom.
Read more U.S., Christianity, fundamentally transformed
I do have a question about this initiative. If this is to protect animal lives and stop animal cruelty, then why isn’t the same protection afforded to the unborn child? Oh, wait, is it because it is a woman’s choice and her body? So if the woman were birthing a salmon, it would be protected under IP 28, yet an unborn human being is not given the same protection? So murder of an unborn child is allowed, yet according to IP 28, I have no choice in what I eat—no steaks, no salmon, no crabs, no shrimp, no bacon and eggs, no milk, no ice cream, no suet to feed the birds or dried mealworms to feed poultry or wild birds. And the list goes on and on. I guess this means Bill Gates’s roach burger is off the table also. After all, you can’t raise animals or insects for food under IP 28.
And how do they expect to grow all these fruits and vegetables for food? Do they realize that almost all of the fertilizers and plant nutrition efforts require animal byproducts, like bone meal, blood meal, feather meal, and fish meal? Plants “eat” animals too!
Now, if this initiative IP 28 passes and I become a newly minted state-mandated vegan, I have a real problem grinding up any green plants to make soyburgers, breakfast cereal, oatmeal, or even bread, because yeast has rights too! Yeast lives and grows, ferments, and makes the bread edible. Yet when yeast has done its job, it is incinerated during bread-baking. We should protect the yeast used in baking from unfair practices involving plant or animal cruelty. I think I will get a tee shirt that says. Rise up for yeast—it has rights!
Read more How government, universities and media form a single political system
Image generated by ChatGPT.