I am MAGA. I make no apology for it. But loyalty to a movement does not require intellectual anesthesia, and if Republicans have learned anything from the political revolutions that brought Donald Trump back to power, it should be that voters eventually demand receipts.
Read more Washington’s spending manifests in the true end of the penny’s 232-year existence
That is why the approaching midterm elections concern me.
Republicans can fill arenas. We can dominate social media for an afternoon. We can produce memes, clips, slogans, flags, hats, chants, and enough digital triumphalism to convince ourselves that the country is experiencing a permanent conservative realignment.
Then somebody has to buy groceries.
That is where political theater encounters economic reality.
The average American does not awaken every morning pondering ideological abstractions. He wonders what happened to his paycheck between Friday and Monday. He looks at groceries, rent, electricity, insurance, medical expenses, gasoline, childcare, and the increasingly absurd cost of simply existing in the country he was told was prospering.
This is where Republicans must resist one of politics’ oldest temptations: believing our own applause. A movement cannot survive indefinitely by telling voters that conditions are wonderful when their checking accounts are telling them otherwise.
Conservatives understood this perfectly during the Biden years. We mocked the administration’s attempts to explain away inflation with favorable statistics while ordinary Americans stared at grocery receipts that resembled mortgage payments. We correctly argued that people experience economies rather than spreadsheets. That principle does not become false because our man occupies the White House.
If affordability remains painful, say so.
If housing remains beyond the reach of young families, confront it.
If healthcare costs remain obscene, address them.
If working-class Americans believe Washington’s definition of prosperity bears little resemblance to their lives, do not lecture them about why their experience is statistically incorrect. Listen to them. That is supposed to be one of the defining differences between populism and establishment politics.
MAGA was never compelling because it promised Americans another collection of Washington policy papers. It was compelling because millions of people believed somebody had finally noticed them. The forgotten man was no longer supposed to be forgotten.
I have never understood conservatism as merely a collection of tax rates and regulatory preferences. Conservatism is ultimately an argument about civilization: family, work, responsibility, sovereignty, faith, community, property, ordered liberty, and the dignity that comes from being able to provide for oneself. But none of those institutions survives economically on rhetoric.
You cannot preach family formation to a 27-year-old man who believes he will never afford a home without addressing why homeownership has become fantastical.
You cannot lecture Americans about personal responsibility while government creates systems in which responsible behavior is routinely punished.
You cannot celebrate work while millions of working people wonder why employment no longer guarantees stability.
Read more Polls Are Even Worse In 2026 Than in 2016
And Republicans cannot spend years condemning Democrat economic gaslighting only to develop our own version when the political incentives change. That would simply be hypocrisy with better PR.
President Trump remains the gravitational center of the Republican Party. Pretending otherwise is political fantasy. His ability to communicate directly with millions of Americans, dominate the news cycle, and energize people who once ignored Republican politics transformed the party. But a movement centered around a singular personality eventually confronts a question every successful movement must answer: Can it become an institution?
Trump cannot be the candidate forever.
At some point, MAGA must demonstrate that it is more than the political biography of Donald J. Trump.
It must become a governing philosophy capable of surviving him.
That means cultivating a host of candidates capable of speaking to suburban parents, black working-class voters, Hispanics, young men, small-business owners, Christians, independents, and people who do not spend twelve hours per day fighting strangers online—but it also means understanding that criticism from inside the movement is not betrayal.
One disagreement and someone is a RINO?
Question a strategy and you are insufficiently loyal?
Criticize a Republican politician and somebody demands to know whether you secretly support Democrats?
This is not MAGA!
Republicans have a lot riding on the midterms, and while we shouldn’t enter November terrified or intoxicated, we should enter it disciplined.
We must also face an uncomfortable reality: Democrats do not have to become popular for Republicans to lose.
Republicans merely have to become disappointing.
Politics is frequently decided not by conversion but by enthusiasm. A voter does not have to become progressive to stay home. He merely has to conclude that showing up will not materially change his life.
That is why governing matters more than branding.
I remain optimistic about the America First movement precisely because it shattered assumptions that had calcified inside both political parties. It challenged globalism, uncontrolled immigration, elite cultural authority, bureaucratic permanence, endless foreign entanglements, and the strange bipartisan consensus that ordinary Americans should accept national decline politely.
If Republicans win, they should treat victory as an instruction, not a coronation—but if they lose, they should resist blaming everybody except themselves.
Read more The Houthis inadvertently helped the US and Israel