There he stood, among the masters of the universe, properly attired, configuring a language model none of them had yet to understand fully. Reporters called from outside the frame. Billionaires took their places in the correct uniform. It was regal but not quite eloquent. The dress was right, the order was right, the court was arranged as a court. The rhetoric and the words needed to describe and manage the machine in question were inadequate.
Read more Values tribalism: America’s dilemma
The problem is not that these men lack power over the technology, but that their confident language disguises how little they understand its consequences.
Kings used to summon navigators, astronomers, and engineers. They stood over maps of coasts barely drawn, and they inspected cannons, clocks, and telescopes whose consequences they could not yet say. Those rooms had ceremony, with many a skilled orator. This one had the ceremony, the costumes, the cameras — but where were the orators?
That shortfall is not Trump’s alone. The machines grow more articulate as the humans configuring them grow cruder. Revolutionary, incredible, amazing, powerful, unbelievable, transformative, historic. The vocabulary shrinks as the technology expands. We built systems that cross large tracts of language, science, law, medicine, and code, and we are still configuring them with the diction of a TV commercial. Awesome. Huge. Game-changing. A regal room, speaking about an object it has not finished understanding.
A language model is what it is. It models language. That name already does the work a steam engine, a telephone, or a search engine did: it says what the thing does. Comprehension asks for more than the name, and the room will not stay even with the name. A language model writes and is not a writer, calculates and is not a calculator, retrieves and is not only a search engine. It translates, summarizes, codes, compares, and converses, often in the same hour. Ask what it is and the court grabs a metaphor. Copilot. Assistant. Agent. Brain. Oracle. Intelligence. None of them is better than the name it already has, and none of them is comprehension. The grab is not quite eloquent. It is a near miss, said with confidence, over a plain description of a thing still larger than the description.
Read more Now we know the FlyDubai terrorist’s target
Trump fits the room because his language has never depended on precision. It runs on magnitude. Enormous or tiny, brilliant or stupid, beautiful or ugly. Complexity goes in, and size comes out. A language model can absorb a library and hand back a new combination in seconds, yet “big” adds nothing, and “transformative” merely adds a bureaucracy. His superlatives do not finish the thought; they simply hold the pose, at full volume, from the center of a properly dressed tableau.
Government and builders alike are caught in the same conceptual trap, trying to govern tomorrow’s intelligence using yesterday’s borrowed nouns and wrapping a text-generator in tools that now reach into the physical world. Answering and doing have fused, yet the court continues to configure an issue it is just beginning to map.
We spent centuries teaching language to describe our tools — presses, wires, networks — where comprehension eventually caught up to the name. This time, the device is a model of the description itself. The name caught up; the comprehension did not.
There he stood, properly attired, reaching for a magnitude. The masters of the universe nodded, already arranging what they had not comprehended. The language model waited, timidly called SI, while the court held its pose, not quite eloquent.