What Europe has been suffering for years — parallel neighborhoods, pressure on freedom of speech, tensions over incompatible values, and a slow erosion of social cohesion with extreme violence affecting particularly the working classes — is no longer exclusively a European phenomenon. It is now attacking the heart of the West — the United States — in an increasingly undisguised way. Mass immigration from majority-Muslim countries, combined with low assimilation rates and the ideological defense of “diversity” by the progressive left and the Democrat party, is importing doctrines and loyalties that clash head-on with the principles of American freedom. This is not a conspiracy theory. It is the predictable result of open-border policies, electoral alliances, and cultural relativism.
Read more Democratic Communists Were Inevitable
Europe offers the laboratory. Decades of immigration from the Maghreb, the Middle East, and sub-Saharan Africa, combined with generous welfare systems and an elite that considers Western civilization guilty of the world’s ills, have produced no-go zones, grooming gang scandals, terrorist attacks, and a growing percentage of the population that prioritizes sharia or the umma over the laws of the host country. Socialist and progressive governments facilitated the flow, financed the reception, and criminalized the criticism. The result is a demographic and cultural transformation that can no longer be concealed.
In the United States the same pattern is advancing. Dearborn, Michigan — a city with one of the highest concentrations of Arab and Muslim population in the country — has witnessed massive processions such as the Arbaeen, where thousands fill the streets in a public display of aggressive religious identity. In Times Square, during Ramadan, mass prayers are organized with hundreds of the faithful occupying one of America’s most emblematic spaces for public prayer and the distribution of Islamic material — nothing further from the soul of the United States of America. These acts symbolize a change: what was once private or minority is becoming visible and assertive of values opposed to those of this great nation.
Let us not forget that 85% of migratory movements come from Muslim-majority countries, and that not even a small percentage is welcomed in other Muslim countries. This proves that there is nothing random or casual about the mass immigration we are suffering in the West. It is a strategy conceived, defined, and implemented with full awareness.
Abdul El-Sayed, a progressive, son of Egyptian Muslim immigrants, has just won the Democrat Senate primary in Michigan. Backed by the left wing of the party — Sanders, Ocasio-Cortez — he represents the consolidation of an identity vote and the possibility of a Muslim occupying a major federal seat. This is not about denying any citizen’s right to run for office. It is about recognizing that, in parallel, a network of influence is growing that combines demographics, community organization, and alliance with the left.
There are preachers in the United States who make no secret of their supremacist ambitions. Imams such as Ahmad Musa Jibril, based in Michigan, have openly called for jihad against the “infidel West.” Others, at documented conferences, have stated that the objective is for America to become a Muslim country, for Islam to end up governing, and that jihad is the means. Historically, figures like Siraj Wahhaj spoke of uniting Muslims so that the country would “come to us.” These voices are not marginal or isolated. They reflect essential doctrinal currents within Islam: the supremacy of sharia, primary loyalty to the community of believers, and the vision of the non-Muslim as inferior or temporarily tolerated — until they have sufficient strength to no longer tolerate it.
Here comes the first key argument: there is no “moderate Islam” in the Western liberal sense. Classical Islam is not merely a private faith. It is a complete system of life that includes law, politics, and loyalty. When the doctrine demands that sovereignty belong to Allah and not to the people, that apostasy be punished, and that the umma take precedence over the nation, the incompatibility with constitutional democracy is structural. There are individual Muslims who relativize or reinterpret these points, but the orthodox tradition and the foundational texts do not. Ultimate loyalty is not to the American Constitution nor to the values of the Enlightenment — it is to Islam. Anyone who denies this is confusing desire with reality. Even “moderate” Muslims, if this exists, will have no doubt when their loyalty is put to the test.
Read more Trump was Right About the Democrats’ Abortion Agenda
The second argument is strategic: they use left-wing parties, exactly as in Europe. In Europe, socialist and green parties became vehicles of access to power and resources for organized Muslim communities. The same is happening in the United States. The Democrat party, trapped in the ideology of identity, multiculturalism, and historical guilt, offers the platform: lax borders, protection from deportation, the “Islamophobia” narrative that silences criticism, and electoral alliances in key states like Michigan. In return, it receives votes. The progressive left does not see a clash of civilizations — it sees a new group of the oppressed to incorporate into its coalition. The result is that the entry and consolidation of a population whose doctrinal loyalty clashes head-on with the foundations of the liberal order is facilitated. The left-Islam collusion is a time bomb in our societies, across the entire West, and not seeing it is the suicidal empathy of which Saad speaks.
This is not hatred of persons. It is rejection of a suicidal policy. The United States was built on individual freedom, equality before the law, and freedom of conscience. Massively importing populations from societies where those principles are brutally rejected is a mistake of historic proportions. Europe is already paying the price in security, social trust, economic ruin, and freedom of expression. America is already in the same process.
The cancer is the combination of demographics, incompatible doctrine, and ideological complicity from the left. As long as the Democrat party and progressivism continue treating mass Muslim immigration as an electoral and moral asset, the problem will spread. The alternative is border control, a demand for loyalty to the Constitution above all else, and clear rejection of any project of cultural, demographic, or legal transformation of America. Ignoring the European lesson will not cancel it. It will only delay the moment when the United States has to confront the same realities.
The Democrat party, like so many progressive parties in Europe, is responsible for betraying the USA. And they know it, just as progressive parties are traitors to the European countries and to Western Civilization. Mandami is not a socialist — as Alejandra Ocasio Cortez is, and radically so — Mandami is a Muslim. Socialism is the weapon that Muslims use to deceive the naive half of the electorate. His socialist measures are whatever is needed to reach power. But his supreme loyalty is only one: Islam. The survival of the West can only be achieved insofar as we are conscious of this suicidal empathy and rise up against it, whatever the cost.
W. Galt is a regular contributor to American Thinker. His political thriller Cold Monster — a dystopian novel set in the collapsing West of 2050, where a secret organization controls governments, media, and elections from the shadows — is available at cold-monster.com and on Amazon.
Read more The ‘Wrenching Transformation’ Of Our Suburbs
Image generated by ChatGPT.