So is Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez going to show her future little Che, Fidel, or whatever she names her kid this particular video about his origins, seen by 7.4 million viewers on X alone?
Read more Social Security is more than an entitlement
AOC is starting her journey for freezing her eggs!
Sharing her doing the shot.
“Don’t be weird about this even though I know you all will be”.
She knows the internet so well. pic.twitter.com/2ywzN8R5d9
— Winter (@LeftyWinter) August 9, 2026
She’s injecting her bare belly with hormone shots to freeze her eggs, the better to harvest the eggs, and then fertilize them at a later day in some test tube and either take the implanted fertilization product herself or shoot it into a surrogate, the way the movie stars do.
So romantic. /s
Love has nothing to do with it.
In this procedure she’s promoting, babies become completely separated from sexual relations and marriage itself solely for the mother’s convenience, and they end up as consumer durables to be passed around and graded for quality control, instead of human beings with actual mothers and fathers.
She’d have to marry the guy she’s been living with since 2022 to get a kid the natural way for that.
But it would be too much to ask. After all, going all natural and organic would interfere with her career and ‘control’ as she puts it, and she knows which one comes first. Some have speculated that she has the White House on her mind and can’t be dealing with a pregnancy or baby.
Much better then to freeze the eggs, turning them into a ‘commodity’ of convenience and put on a show instead.
She’s not the only one who’s done it.
Last year, Rep. Sara Jacobs, also aged 36, demonstrated her egg-freezing ‘journey’ for Instagram. It probably didn’t get as much attention as AOC’s would, which might be why AOC got in front of the cameras, but it certainly was detailed.
Read more At long last, Senate Republicans condemn the Muslim Brotherhood
Yet statistics show that most women who do this don’t get around to having the baby at all — the Washington Post reported that it was only 5.7 percent.
For the ones who do, the children get the knowledge that their entry into the world was done at a convenient time for the mother and their parts sat in some refrigerator with other fluids or spare parts until the test tube came calling. It sounds like a formula for problems for the children as they grow up.
Sure, there may be legitimate reasons to do this, e.g., to preserve fertility during cancer treatment, for instance. But in that case, a kid who came of it wouldn’t have any problem hearing about his origins as the alternative was a greater evil and he wouldn’t have been born at all.
This, though, is different, not a mystery or miracle of life but a forced convenience to mom so she can beat her completely natural biological clock and take care of a baby in her 40s orr 50s. (I know women who have done this, by the way based on surrogacy, and let’s just say it was not easy.)
But this is what AOC and Jacobs are promoting.
So is AOC going to show a future child who comes as a result of that trip to the deep freeze that video?
Do tell.
After all, she shows and tells everything else.
Doesn’t matter. He will find out one way or another and eventually see that video, poor kid.
Read more Correctly calling them commies
Image: X video screenshot